Yesterday, 04:40 AM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 04:42 AM by Incelicious.)
(Yesterday, 04:29 AM)fukmylyf Wrote: Seems like a risky investment to me. But this is a great post IMO.
I agree - a lot of incels underestimate the power of social context and conditioning. Attractiveness is relative to an extent. Women are less picky when you limit their choices and freedom, and keep them unaware of their SMV.
This is one of the reasons I identify with patriarchycels, traditioncels, shariacels, etc. Females will be content with less if they don't know any better. A lot of the older folks in my family are in semi-arranged marriages, and their relationships are practically bulletproof. I can honestly say some of these guys would be incel if they grew up in the West.
The problem is that feminism is infecting the rest of the world at a rapid pace. We need to keep that shit quarantined.
Feminism is practically guaranteed with urbanization. The more urban (and thus more stable the environment), the more sexual dimorphism matters to a femoid. It's why in Russia you'll see some gremlins with a 9/10+ female at their side. Or even in Brazil, or [insert non-First World nation here]. It's why Russian women really play up the sexual dimorphism to appeal to betabux guys because the alphafux Chads are likely to be gopniks that can't even get a job and pretty much swindle, drink, and smoke all day.
The more a female is required to play up her sexual dimorphism to score a man, the less feminist she is.
Consider that when the environment is stable, she doesn't need a man for that. Every chump from her environment can offer that. Hell, the STATE can offer that. Her needs are taken care of from cradle to grave. So what stands out? Sexual dimorphism = Chad.